Community Center: February 2009 Archives

The Meredith News  February 12, 2009

 

To the Editor: It’s hard for me to believe that once again there is a small group of people that are coming through the back door to propose a plan to build new ball fields at the site of the Moultonboro Lions Club. This is only a back-door tactic to once again to try to build a recreation center after it was voted down at last year’s Town Meeting. This group of individuals must have not listened to the voters last year, who are made up of mostly retires on fixed incomes, that voted this whole issue down. Smarten up! Last year there was talk about a recession, when the recreation center/gym/pool/ ballfields were talked about and with the town once again becoming a donor town. Well, listen up! We are in a recession and in uncharted waters and we are going to become a donor town again. This group of people, looking to spend tax money at the expense of taxpayers at this time - get out of the bubble and quit watching Sesame Street! This economy is crumbling and thousands of people are out of work and losing jobs daily and citizens are hurting, both working and the ones retired. You may not at this point be affected from this crisis, but believe me, it could happen soon. No one will escape it. No one has a job for life today and I wonder if you were behind the eight ball, if you would want to see taxes go up? This is a year when budgets should and must be cut and no so-called pork

spending! I would also like to point out that there was a article a few days back that indicated that the youth population is declining in Moultonboro and there is going to be a study done to the cause of this. Question? Who are we building these new ball/soccer fields for? The retirees who make up the majority of the town? It can not be for the increase in our youth population. Message to the selectmen - please check with the Meredith selectmen to see if you can learn something from them, since their proposed budget is a decrease of 1.94 percent instead of an increase of 0.21 percent in ours!

 

Joe Quaresima

Moultonboro

"We are in no way implying that we do or do not support the rec project; we’re simply pointing out that the town shouldn’t start spending money it will probably never see."

 

You can count your chickens before they hatch – it’s what we call estimating. But counting chickens before the rooster arrives at the coop – that’s another matter entirely. We’re talking about the plan to construct playing fields on the Lions Club land on Route 109, and specifically the thought that part of the nationwide $825 billion economic stimulus package, currently under debate in Congress, could go toward the project. Town Administrator Carter Terenzini explained  that the Parks and Recreation Department was looking into doing the project in phases, the first of which would focus on addressing drainage issues on the land and building the fields. The town would likely be asking for $300,000. The second phase would cost $130,000, an amount that Terenzini said they hoped to get through volunteer efforts and parts of the economic stimulus package. As selectman and State Representative Betsey Patten pointed out, the New Hampshire House is already talking about potential projects using economic stimulus funds, and that the more populous places in the state would be the more likely candidates to receive funding. In fact, on Monday morning Gov. John Lynch and the state's congressional delegation met to discuss the stimulus package. A press release quoted Lynch as saying the meeting was an important step in deciding “how New Hampshire can most effectively use funds to protect our most vulnerable citizens and create jobs." That was the sentiment repeated by Senator Judd Gregg and Congresswoman Carol Shea- Porter as well – that these funds need to create jobs and otherwise boost the economy. Improving the state’s infrastructure is high on the list as well. So how does the Town of Moultonboro factor in? It probably doesn’t. The project isn’t going tocreate many jobs or boost the economy. It may improve the well-being of the community, but in the grand scheme of things, it is a trivial project to the rest of the state. We are in no way implying that we do or do not support the rec project; we’re simply pointing out that the town shouldn’t start spending money it will probably never see.

HOME

About this Archive

This page is a archive of entries in the Community Center category from February 2009.

Community Center: June 2008 is the previous archive.

Community Center: March 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Categories

Powered by Movable Type 4.01